A comprehensive framework that combines business, technology and governance resources is needed to overcome common AI governance challenges.
As a practice, AI governance is relatively new, and like any other emerging field it faces certain challenges on its road to maturity. These challenges can be viewed through the popular rubric of people, process and technology (PPT).
Challenges of AI governance
The hype around AI makes you think otherwise, but AI is still in its early stages of enterprise adoption. So, governance challenges reflect that.
Lack of governance expertise. The first of these challenges is limited expertise. The need for AI governance and how it affects the success of AI projects is still not widely understood. This limited awareness further translates into limited availability of governance experts. Lack of governance expertise is not unique to end-user organizations. Different players in the ecosystem, such as product vendors and consulting companies, are in the same boat.
Ad hoc process. The second is that even among organizations that recognize the need for AI governance, it is done in an ad hoc manner that lacks a cross-functional approach. By default, technology teams have been leading AI projects. But the main focus of technical teams should be on AI models and model risk management, while other teams focus on other aspects of these projects.
Emerging tool sets. Thirdly, tools intended to streamline AI governance practices are emerging now, but they’re difficult to directly incorporate into existing enterprise data science and machine learning workflows. Their emergence is partially good news, because tools usually bake in best practices, but challenges remain.
Overcoming challenges using a holistic framework
AI governance is a team sport where business, technology and governance experts all have their key responsibility areas (KRAs) (Figure 1).
This depicts an enterprise AI governance framework.
A holistic view of AI governance with clearly defined roles and responsibilities ushers in better accountability and transparency. Business goals should drive the enterprise AI strategy. Business goals also determine the investments and budgets for AI projects. The corporate social responsibility (CSR) and environmental, social and governance policies of an organization also provide inputs into the AI strategy.
The governance layer is often missing in organizations today, but it’s a crucial interface between business and technical teams. Compared to traditional IT, AI projects were previously lacking in well-established standard methodologies. Governance can now establish the AI standards, methodologies and benchmarks, and the responsibility for performance metrics lies with the technical teams.
An AI governance framework also provides oversight and supervision while entrusting the technical teams with core technical aspects, such as data engineering, building models, choosing best-fit AI platforms and implementing MLOps tools. When the link between business goals and AI strategy is established, build versus buy decisions also become easier. For example, in the early days of AI, many organizations built their own tools for end-to-end machine learning pipelines, but with the maturity of MLOps products, buying is a viable alternative.
This framework helps ensure that a technical team focuses on technical risk, while a governance team looks at the implications and outcomes of AI for users.
As AI regulations loom, the governance team has a responsibility to keep track of and identify the requirements for compliance. The team helps liaise with any required regulatory authorities and provides the regulators with any required data and information. This team also draws up a risk management plan and may even serve as an internal AI audit function or facilitate external AI audits.
Risk must be managed in all stages of the AI lifecycle: training data, model development, post-deployment performance, impact and outcomes. This framework helps ensure that a technical team focuses on technical risk, while a governance team looks at the implications and outcomes of AI for users.
In many organizations, the technical team has been trying to perform all these functions by itself. Strong technical capabilities are necessary, but more elements are required for a successful AI governance framework. Technical expertise needs to be complemented with effective governance capabilities at the enterprise level.
Most organizations already have risk and governance experts who can be trained and engaged for AI governance. Having effective AI governance means a business has a strong foundation to scale, protect from risk and improve ROI on AI investments.
You have viewed over 50 articles in the last 12 months. Keep Olympic News Free Support insidethegames.biz for as little as £10 For nearly 15 years now, insidethegames.biz has been at the forefront of reporting fearlessly on what happens in the Olympic Movement. As the first website not to be […]
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.